If the bigs can defend smaller guards & the 3 then I am ok with going big. What we had last year was not good. big slower guys against smaller quicker guys and having to help everyone by leaving your man is recipe for disaster. We missed the D of the guards last year and it cost us dearly.BigJack85 said:SFAJack_76 said:PurpleOut said:
Yeah I don't get the TJ comparison. Daniels has good size, but he doesn't have the same athleticism or shooting ability that TJ did. Our pick and pop with TJ was one of our most dangerous plays. Daniels won't provide that.
Excited to have him obviously, he's just a different type of player.
Agree.
If Seraille develops running out a big lineup for 5-6 minutes could be an intriguing way to open things up.
The coaches know that they need guards and need them now, not 2 years from now. So they went and got 3 guards from JUCO. I also consider Brown more of a combo like Kevon than a true forward. I assume Daniels is a spot of depth needed in the post after the assumed loss of Nieminen (due 2 injury as posted here). At this point it is clear they know they need a freshman guard to restart the pipeline and add to Walker. They can't be so dependent on JUCO going forward. Richie Riley did it at Nicholls but I don't think that is a sustainable model.