cboothe09 said:
HitSomeBody said:
cboothe09 said:
Kind of a Kendall Briles fan. A year under Lane Kiffen and a year under Major Applewhite. FAU has seen their offense take a few steps back since he left. Houston has the highest scoring offense in NCAA right now. Thoughts?
Being a Baylor Alumni, I don't think any of the assistants should be coaching after what transpired at Baylor for the sake of winning. I want SFA to win, I want them to win right. It's ok to bring up Kendall because if you look at what he learned from his dad (I'm talking just X's and O's) he learned how to know what players he has and build an attack plan to play on their strengths. That is why at FAU their offense led in yardage in their division and now at Houston they are racking up yards and points. Different teams, different players, yet same offensive results. It's the non- X's and O's side of football that I do not think a program like SFA who needs to rebuild can risk taking the chance on him. Plus, I don't think he would leave the FBS ranks anyway.
Now, all that being said, I do think hiring one of them (probably his dad since Kendall is at Houston) as an independent offensive consultant to work behind the scene and not with the players would be worth it for whoever comes in as our OC. Kind of like an IT consultant SOW. Draw one up where he works for 4 to 6 weeks with the OC on the drawing board during the offseason then contract is done.
I knew there was baggage with Kendall, and he will be a short list for some big school gigs after this year. To be fair, he was never named or implicated in the mess that his father oversaw in Waco. That said, the baggage associated with the name alone is enough to scare some people away and it is something I completely understand.
With Kendall I could work past it, but wouldn't be heartbroken if we didn't bring him in. Just an intriguing name...
Kendall and other parties not being named is partially by design. Baylor did everything in its power to not leave a paper trail, avoid naming anyone in particular responsible, and to hide the extents of the scandal.
This is the from the summary of the report, which FWIW, has never been heard outside of the Baylor board of regents, and was delivered orally so there wouldn't be a paper copy subject to subpoenas.
"football coaches and staff took improper steps in response to disclosures of sexual assault or dating violence that precluded the University from fulfilling its legal obligations."
Toxic situation all around, one that can stay at Houston IMO.