SFA Jack Fanatic said:
TallTexan said:
Texas loses to Kansas.
Why must my basketball teams mirror each other?
Read an AP article with the headline "Setback doesn't help Longhorns chances". DOESN'T HELP THEIR CHANCES??? What "chances" would/could/should a team that is 16-16 possibly have???????
big conferences have the advantage they can have most of their non-con games at home or on a neutral site to pad a resume and then they can have losing records in conference play and still get into the tournament. The quadrant system has helped the non-con scheduling some by pushing teams to schedule harder in the non-con or go to more neutral site games. But there will be teams in the tournament like Texas was last year that had a losing record in conference play and still be in the tournament. Texas lost last year to Nevada in the first round in OT.
Not sure if this is still a rule but in football but there was a rule that stated you had to win a certain # of games to be bowl eligible. I think there should be a rule like that to get in to the NCAA Tourney. Teams should have to win a minimum # of games in their conference. I understand that conferences like the ACC and Big12 have great basketball teams and if you have to play schools like North Carolina, Duke etc. a couple times in conference play your conference record is going to suffer but I would rather see a great mid-major that just happened to lose their conference tourney and didn't get the auto bid and now gets stuck with an NIT bid over the 8-9th best team in a big conference.