Why Ive just accepted our fate for SLC. Its really the only practical option. Unless someone we change the landscape and put all Texas schools into one but we know Southland won't let that happen.BigJack85 said:
I'm not certain we'll get many answers on Wednesday. Perhaps McBroom will say, "The move is being planned now". "We plan to lay a full Southland Conference schedule for all sports". Football might be an exception. Maybe.
It's been stated accurately that student athletes are an integral component of the decision making process, for conference affiliation. The student athlete experience is important. That being said, we can all agree that the Southland Conference doesn't enhance our academic affiliation. Not that the WAC was 100% but Seattle and CBU are national universities.
I think it's accurate , to say that we REALLY don't have many other options?
1. I doubt the ASUN was "that" interested in adding a single team, that is more than 600 miles away (Florence , AL) . Now if we brought ACU and Tarleton along it might have made a little sense (better RPI than SLC) geography is bad but not as bad as the WAC).
2.The OVC is as bad as the SLC. 26 vs 27 RPI.
The big benefit for SFA fans, is proximity. I'll make more games just by virtue of being in Houston (HBU and Beaumont or close). I'm sure a number of people on this board will find SLC locales more accessible.
Ease of use wins. Sadly the case hear.
"To see the world, things dangerous to come to, to see behind walls, draw closer, to find each other, and to feel. That is the purpose of life."