WEEK 12: #8 UIW

7,596 Views | 167 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by SFAJack_76
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was not impressed by neither UIW nor Calzada. This would have been a W for SFA "if only"....
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFA Jack Fanatic said:

I was not impressed by neither UIW nor Calzada. This would have been a W for SFA "if only"....


Our defense is for real. If we hold onto Carthel and Mutz, we hold onto that defense, as well as get Vidlak back.

I know everyone hates "next year" talk because we do that every year, but screw it, next year we will be good.
65tosspowertrap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFASawmillGuy said:

SFA Jack Fanatic said:

I was not impressed by neither UIW nor Calzada. This would have been a W for SFA "if only"....


Our defense is for real. If we hold onto Carthel and Mutz, we hold onto that defense, as well as get Vidlak back.

I know everyone hates "next year" talk because we do that every year, but screw it, next year we will be good.
They will keep Carthel. This is SFA, not Texas A&M. They won't eat the remaining year of his contract, plus it is difficult to fire a coach when you lose a very good quarterback. I'm no fan, but he's coming back and I'll wish him and the kids success.
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks 42-27

Final 20-27

22 more points and I'm



nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Celebrating on our own field.

Ljacks&Longnecks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd hang that in the Fieldhouse all year until next Late August for motivation.
MasterAxe2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Celebrating on our own field.




Good for them. They're a legit program. I'd want our guys to celebrate on an opposing field.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely not upset with them. They deserved it. A dude right next to me had to be escorted away because he was about to get into a fight with their players. But I'll be happier when it's us.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I sat with Clayton Wayland's (WR) parents at the game. Good looking freshman who was doing some good blocking. Would have had the play of the game if he could have pulled in the one handed catch I. The first quarter. Look forward to having him for three more years.
Ljacks&Longnecks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wayland was on one of the pressers with Vidlak. Seemed like a legit good guy with a true desire to help the team and be good at what he does. Definitely want him to stay here for all 4 years with that attitude.
Ljacks&Longnecks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hope that LacesOut will chime in about the OLine today. They were not on top of their game and the ESPN+ guys mentioned some OL injuries in practice this week. Injuries and playing out of position in the line makes a difference.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Definitely not upset with them. They deserved it. A dude right next to me had to be escorted away because he was about to get into a fight with their players. But I'll be happier when it's us.
I was expecting a loss, but hey, we played the game closer than I thought. It would have been better if Vidlak had been there. I don't think IWU is as strong as its rank says unless it plays a weak, defense-minded team.
MasterAxe2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ljacks&Longnecks said:

Don't worry. The anti Carthel crowd will show up at game's end and tell you.


I don't know if I'm full "Anti-Carthel" as much as I am "pro-winning."

The facts don't lie: he has a losing record at SFA.

I am absolutely sure he's a good leader and "allegedly" a good recruiter. But, this is a results-oritented business.

And the results, the facts, place him as a below average head coach.

Are we insane for keeping him? Probably not. Seems like a great ambassador for the school and program. Are we insane to expect anything more than average? The results would indicate that's exactly what we'd get.
Ljacks&Longnecks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Master---You are not the crowd I was referring to, he showed of course, 1 or 2 others haven't yet.
I enjoy your commentary, "almost" all the time. You take the time to give discussion and evidence to back your thoughts. Sometimes with the comic relief which is welcome. Heck we even agree sometimes.

You are correct about Carthel's record. Next year is last year of contract. I would expect he Must produce next year, time for excuses is used up. I certainly hope he does. If next year is a repeat of this year then I would expect change.
MasterAxe2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ljacks&Longnecks said:

Master---You are not the crowd I was referring to, he showed of course, 1 or 2 others haven't yet.
I enjoy your commentary, "almost" all the time. You take the time to give discussion and evidence to back your thoughts. Sometimes with the comic relief which is welcome. Heck we even agree sometimes.

You are correct about Carthel's record. Next year is last year of contract. I would expect he Must produce next year, time for excuses is used up. I certainly hope he does. If next year is a repeat of this year then I would expect change.


I have been known, at times, to be a reasonable person lol

We"ll run it back next year and just play to the Lord Up High that Vidlak stays healthy. It's clear we haven't recruited good enough QB's to manage games if Sam is out.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I was going to make the case for Carthel through next year, it would be on this:

1. Everyone agrees he's a good dude and a good spokesperson for the university. His family is even bought in to Nacogdoches itself, owning a business here.

2. While breaking in a new OC, the offensive stats are much improved over last season. Defensive stats are also greatly improved. Obviously you'd want to see more wins, but Carthel made changes and we're more competitive.

3. You get a lot back next year. Vidlak, two coordinators, another year of recruiting.

4. The buyout could be better used on other imminent needs.

That's a foundation you can build on going into a contract year.
MasterAxe2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TallTexan said:

If I was going to make the case for Carthel through next year, it would be on this:

1. Everyone agrees he's a good dude and a good spokesperson for the university. His family is even bought in to Nacogdoches itself, owning a business here.

2. While breaking in a new OC, the offensive stats are much improved over last season. Defensive stats are also greatly improved. Obviously you'd want to see more wins, but Carthel made changes and we're more competitive.

3. You get a lot back next year. Vidlak, two coordinators, another year of recruiting.

4. The buyout could be better used on other imminent needs.

That's a foundation you can build on going into a contract year.


I don't think you have to make any case, I think we're all pretty sure he's back.

Your first point, while nice…is irrelevant to winning football games.

The rest, I agree with. Just pray to baby infant Jesus that Sam stays healthy and that our coaches learn some game/clock management.
sfajack05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't wait to have the same conversation again a year from now.
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At this point what are our options? Idk.
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
MasterAxe2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigJack85 said:

At this point what are our options? Idk.


https://csurams.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/jeremy-moses/3328
sfajack05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TallTexan said:

If I was going to make the case for Carthel through next year, it would be on this:

1. Everyone agrees he's a good dude and a good spokesperson for the university. His family is even bought in to Nacogdoches itself, owning a business here.

2. While breaking in a new OC, the offensive stats are much improved over last season. Defensive stats are also greatly improved. Obviously you'd want to see more wins, but Carthel made changes and we're more competitive.

3. You get a lot back next year. Vidlak, two coordinators, another year of recruiting.

4. The buyout could be better used on other imminent needs.

That's a foundation you can build on going into a contract year.


Why are we still building a foundation 5-6 years in? Should have already been built and established by now. Other schools have passed us by a mile during that time.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sfajack05 said:

TallTexan said:

If I was going to make the case for Carthel through next year, it would be on this:

1. Everyone agrees he's a good dude and a good spokesperson for the university. His family is even bought in to Nacogdoches itself, owning a business here.

2. While breaking in a new OC, the offensive stats are much improved over last season. Defensive stats are also greatly improved. Obviously you'd want to see more wins, but Carthel made changes and we're more competitive.

3. You get a lot back next year. Vidlak, two coordinators, another year of recruiting.

4. The buyout could be better used on other imminent needs.

That's a foundation you can build on going into a contract year.


Why are we still building a foundation 5-6 years in? Should have already been built and established by now. Other schools have passed us by a mile during that time.


Bc the 2023 season was bad and we knew we needed fixes on offense and defense? One of which included a new coordinator?

I mean you can throw all those out and hope the new person will bring a QB, a good OC and DC and game management, and win right away.

Or, given that we've got a year left on Carthel's contract anyway, the easier thing to address this off-season is the game management aspects and leave those other pieces in place.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MasterAxe2 said:

TallTexan said:

If I was going to make the case for Carthel through next year, it would be on this:

1. Everyone agrees he's a good dude and a good spokesperson for the university. His family is even bought in to Nacogdoches itself, owning a business here.

2. While breaking in a new OC, the offensive stats are much improved over last season. Defensive stats are also greatly improved. Obviously you'd want to see more wins, but Carthel made changes and we're more competitive.

3. You get a lot back next year. Vidlak, two coordinators, another year of recruiting.

4. The buyout could be better used on other imminent needs.

That's a foundation you can build on going into a contract year.


I don't think you have to make any case, I think we're all pretty sure he's back.

Your first point, while nice…is irrelevant to winning football games.

The rest, I agree with. Just pray to baby infant Jesus that Sam stays healthy and that our coaches learn some game/clock management.


The first point is primarily unrelated to winning football games, but there are certainly worse things than losing them.

I never want a Briles, Kelly, Paterno, etc type leading our program bc SFA would never recover from a "win at all costs" type coach if folks got hurt.

Carthel being a good dude isn't a guarantee that would never happen, but I do think it's still a plus in his column.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To add to a lot of the surprisingly good points.

Carthel has improved this team. In 2023 the team was not up to par. The same fight, confidence, and drive wasn't there from what we've seen from prior Carthel teams.

He brought in Chris Ross, who admittedly needed a little time, but ended up making our offense very strong. Brought in Vidlak, who in every way looks like one of, if not potentiality one of the best pure passers SFA has ever had. I loved Moses, but Sam has an a better arm in a less QB friendly offense.

SFA's defense is elite. Not good. Elite. These dudes can play ball and when we run the schemes we ran against UIW and FBS opponents we can compete with anyone, regardless of the talent gap.

In 2023, we had talent, but the drive wasn't there. It resulted in 3 wins. This season, we had at best more than potentially a 11-1 regular season, and a worst a 6-6 year. That's a drastic improvement.

2025 SFA will be a make or break year. It's contract year so it's gonna be playoffs or bust. Everyone knows that. But keeping Carthel means we keep the pieces to make 2025 a very special season. If it's not, yes we move on. But with Carthel at the helm next year, the Jacks will be in everyone's radar.

Expectations will be through the roof if we can hold onto Carthel, Ross, and Mutz. Anything less than playing after thanksgiving will be considered a loss. But if we make a change, more than likely we will be waiting another few years before SFA Football is back to where we want to be.
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent points, SawmillGuy! I knew there was a reason why we've kept you around.

Hoping beyond hope that other schools don't come picking off our coaches again the way LaTech has in the past. We've got some good ones!

And Carthel needs to hit the portal for another quality QB, because it's glaringly obvious that after Vidlak we've got no one ready to step into the spotlight right now.
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After 11

QB: #15 SAM VIDLAK 6-1; 207 (JR.)
G:9;ATT:257;CMP:174;CMP%:68.0;YDS:2,387;TD:27;INT:4
QB: #13 GAVIN RUTHERFORD 6-3; 210 (R/FR.)
G:8;ATT:92;CMP:58;CMP%:63.0;YDS:576;TD:2;INT:2;/R:36;YDS:77;TD:3
QB: #12 DALTON MCELYEA 6-3; 196 (JR.)
G:5;ATT:3;CMP:2;CMP%:67.0;YDS:35;TD:2;INT:0;/R:3;YDS:9;TD:0

RB: #23 QUALAN JONES 5-10; 242 (JR.)
G:9;ATT:130;YDS:717;AVG:5.5;TD:6/REC:13;YDS:80;TD:0
RB: #24 JAYLEN JENKINS 5-11; 185 (SO.)
G:9;ATT:88;YDS:508;AVG:6.0;TD:3/REC:3;YDS:48;TD:0
RB: #10 JERRELL WIMBLEY 5-11; 195 (JR.)
G:10;ATT:58;YDS:325;AVG:6.0;TD:3/REC:10;YDS:107;TD:0
RB: #28 DEAGO BENSON 5-11; 205 (R/FR.)
G:7;ATT:17;YDS:94;AVG:5.5;TD:0/REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
RB: #35 CHRIS MARTINEZ 5-11; 195 (FR.)
G:8;ATT:9;YDS:56;AVG:6.2;TD:0/REC:1;YDS:14;TD:0
RB: #8 ANTHONY WILLIAMS 6-1; 211 (JR.)
G:10;ATT:8;YDS:36;AVG:4.5;TD:0/REC:17;YDS:142;TD:2
RB: #30 LUKE ULLRICH 5-10; 190 (FR.)
G:1;ATT:1;YDS:11;AVG:11.0;TD:0/REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0

WR: #4 KYLON HARRIS 5-11; 160 (JR.)
G:11;REC:81;YDS:958;TD:9
WR: #18 JORDAN NABORS 5-11; 185 (SO.)
G:11;REC:26;YDS:420;TD:6
WR: #7 BLAINE GREEN 6-1; 213 (SO.)
G:6;REC:22;YDS:395;TD:3
WR: #14 ISAIAH DAVIS 6-3; 190 (SO.)
G:10;REC:14;YDS:234;TD:2
WR: #17 ROHAN FLUELLEN 5-11; 170 (R/FR.)
G:8;REC:19;YDS:202;TD:2
WR: #21 CLAYTON WAYLAND 6-3; 200 (FR.)
G:8;REC:11;YDS:186;TD:3
WR: #19 TY LOVE 6-2; 200 (SR.)
G:10;REC:4;YDS:38;TD:1
WR: #87 TA'ERIK TATE 6-1; 180 (FR.)
G:3;REC:2;YDS:30;TD:0
WR: #82 TYJUAN ATKINS 6-0; 190 (SR.)
G:3;REC:1;YDS:25;TD:1
WR: #81 CHRIS TAYLOR 5-10; 175 (JR.)
G:5;REC:2;YDS:23;TD:1
WR: #84 DAX BRIDGES 5-10; 190 (JR.)
G:2;REC:1;YDS:17;TD:1
WR: #83 CANNON LEMBERG 6-0; 170 (FR.)
G:9;REC:1;YDS:13;TD:0
WR: #11 DERRICK BOHLER 6-2; 201 (R/FR.)
G:6;REC:2;YDS:12;TD:0
WR: #20 ISAAC JONES 5-11; 185 (R/FR.)
G:3;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
WR: #43 JONAH ROBERSON 5-11; 140 (R/FR.)
G:1;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
WR: #27 STETSON SURRATT 5-10; 165 (FR.)
G:1;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
WR: #84 CAMERON KELLEY 6-5; 220 (FR.)
G:2;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0

TE: #88 LAVAR LINDO 6-4; 245 (JR.)
G:10;REC:4;YDS:54;TD:0

OL: #71 ROBERT KELLER 6-7; 310 (JR.) GP:11
OL: #56 JAKE HENRY 6-3; 290 (G-SR.) GP:10
OL: #73 NATE ADAMS 6-7; 321 (SR.) GP:11
OL: #72 DARREN WIANCKO 6-2; 300 (JR.) GP:11
OL: #77 JAYMON LAMB 6-5; 250 (R/FR.) GP:9
OL: #57 JARED MANOS 6-0; 250 (JR.) GP:10
OL: #55 ERIK GRAY 6-1; 280 (SO.) GP:8
OL: #61 JASON CROWDER 6-1; 290 (R/FR.) GP:8
OL: #54 CHIMDIA NWAIWU 6-6; 255 (SO.) GP:7
OL: #74 GIOVANNY ALEGRIA 6-6; 335 (JR.) GP:4
OL: #51 IAN MORGAN 6-4; 250 (SO.) GP:4
OL: #68 SETH MARTIN 6-3; 285 (SO.) GP:3
OL: #50 WILL THOMPSON V 5-11; 265 (JR.) GP:3
OL: #52 ZAVIER LEONARD 6-7; 310 (JR.) GP:1
OL: #67 KOLT DE LA TORRE 6-2; 310 (R/FR.) GP:1
OL: #66 CAMERON VARGAS 6-4; 280 (FR.) GP:1

DL: #2 AARON AUSTIN 6-2; 210 (SO.)
G:11;TKL:46;TFL:8.0;SCK:2.5;QBH:9;FF:1;FR:0;PD:1;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #3 EDWARD BOBINO III 6-2; 340 (SO.)
G:11;TKL:44;TFL:7.5;SCK:1.5;QBH:5;FF:0;FR:0;PD:1;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #22 XAVIER POTTS 6-0; 315 (R/FR.)
G:11;TKL:31;TFL:4.0;SCK:1.5;QBH:1;FF:0;FR:0;PD:1;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #99 VICTOR IDUSUYI 6-1; 325 (JR.)
G:11;TKL:24;TFL:7.0;SCK:2.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:1;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #97 KY THOMAS 6-3; 250 (SR.)
G:11;TKL:24;TFL:6.5;SCK:2.0;QBH:8;FF:0;FR:0;PD:2;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #91 ELIJAH FIELDS 5-11; 270 (SO.)
G:10;TKL:20;TFL:4.0;SCK:2.5;QBH:0;FF:1;FR:0;PD:2;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #23 TREVION SNEED 6-1; 260 (SO.)
G:8;TKL:18;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:3;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #49 TIM MUHAMMAD 6-4; 230 (R/FR.)
G:11;TKL:15;TFL:2.5;SCK:1.0;QBH:1;FF:0;FR:1;PD:2;INT:1;BLK:0
DL: #95 K'MARD KIMBLE 6-2; 300 (FR.)
G:7;TKL:9;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.5;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:1;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #58 JOEY FINLEY 6-3; 240 (SO.)
G:6;TKL:7;TFL:1.0;SCK:1.0;QBH:1;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DL: #96 KAIDEN TURNER 6-2; 250 (R/FR.)
G:5;TKL:6;TFL:2.5;SCK:2.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:1;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0;TD:1
DL: #92 NICHOLAS PEREZ 6-2; 255 (FR.)
G:2;TKL:2;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0

LB: #14 JOSIAH COTTON 5-11; 232 (G/SR.)
G:11;TKL:64;TFL:8.0;SCK:2.0;QBH:7;FF:1;FR:0;PD:3;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #0 JERMAINE BROWN 6-1; 210 (SR.)
G:9;TKL:53;TFL:3.5;SCK:1.5;QBH:3;FF:0;FR:1;PD:3;INT:3;BLK:0
LB: #36 JAYDON SOUTHARD 6-0; 210 (JR.)
G:11;TKL:45;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:1;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #25 LUKE WATSON 6-2; 225 (JR.)
G:10;TKL:28;TFL:2.5;SCK:1.0;QBH:3;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:1;BLK:0
LB: #26 TONY ANYWANU 6-2; 246 (JR.)
G:11;TKL:18;TFL:6.0;SCK:4.0;QBH:5;FF:1;FR:0;PD:1;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #11 LANE LEWIS 6-2; 215 (SR.)
G:7;TKL:9;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:1;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #29 RYAN WILLIAMS 6-1; 195 (SO.)
G:4;TKL:8;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #45 JEMARI SEALS 6-0; 210 (SO.)
G:6;TKL:4;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #32 DANIEL ANENIH 6-2; 230 (JR.)
G:2;TKL:3;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #39 LOWOTE JURKIN 6-4; 220 (FR.)
G:3;TKL:1;TFL:1.0;SCK:1.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
LB: #42 MICHAEL WOODS 6-3; 220 (FR.)
G:1;TKL:1;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0

DB: #15 TRASHAWN ADAMS 5-11; 190 (SR.)
G:11;TKL:52;TFL:3.0;SCK:1.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:3;INT:1
DB: #20 JAHEIM MULLEN 6-0; 204 (G/SR.)
G:11;TKL:45;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:2;FR:2;PD:2;INT:4
DB: #5 JEREMIAH WALKER 6-0; 200 (SR.)
G:11;TKL:33;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:1;FR:0;PD:6;INT:0
DB: #6 CHARLES DEMMINGS 6-1; 185 (JR.)
G:10;TKL:19;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:9;INT:2;BLK:0
DB: #27 TYLER HUTCHERSON 5-9; 160 (R/FR)
G:10;TKL:18;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:1;FR:1;PD:2;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #1 BRUCE HARMON 6-0; 200 (SR.)
G:9;TKL:18;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;QBH:1;FF:0;FR:1;PD:1;INT:1
DB: #9 DYLAN TOOKER 5-9; 190 (SR.)
G:9;TKL:17;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:1;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #29 MIKE PATTERSON 5-11; 162 (R/FR.)
G:10;TKL:17;TFL:0.5;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:1;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #13 AARON SEARS 5-10; 190 (SO.)
G:4;TKL:12;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #34 CHANCE SAUTTER 5-10; 179 (R/FR.)
G:9;TKL:9;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:1;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #24 AZARIAH LEVELLS 6-0; 185 (JR.)
G:7;TKL:6;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:1;INT:1
DB: #38 KAMERON REDDIC 6-0; 185 (FR.)
G:7;TKL:5;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0
DB: #30 HOLLIS ROBINSON 5-11; 181 (SO.)
G:9;TKL:5;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #12 MONTEGO JOHNSON 5-11; 187 (SR.)
G:6;TKL:4;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #35 JORDAN JACKSON 6-1; 177 (SO.)
G:3;TKL:3;TFL:0.5;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #89 COLE LEMONS 6-3; 185 (SO.)
G:11;TKL:3;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:1;BLK:0
DB: #31 JALON HUNTER 5-11; 190 (JR.)
G:1;TKL:3;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:1;INT:0;BLK:0
DB: #28 JAKE GILLESPIE 5-9; 180 (FR.)
G:7;TKL:3;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0
DB: #17 DONOAVAN LANG 6-0; 175 (FR.)
G:2;TKL:2;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:1;INT:0
DB: #37 JAYVIN MAYFIELD 6-0; 175 (FR.)
G:2;TKL:2;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0
DB: #18 JACOB ROOKS 5-10; 185 (SO.)
G:6;TKL:1;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0
DB: #28 BRADEN LEWIS 6-0; 190 (FR.)
G:1;TKL:1;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0
DB: #24 KENTRELLE OMAR 5-10; 170 (JR.)
G:1;TKL:1;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;QBH:0;FF:0;FR:0;PD:0;INT:0;BLK:0

LS: #47 TUG SANFORD 6-0; 200 (SO.) GP:11
LS: #00 BLAKE ROBINSON 6-1. 220 (FR.) GP:1

P: #22 CALLUM EDDINGS 5-11; 155 (JR.)
G:11;ATT:42;YDS:1,897;LNG:67;AVG:45.2;TB:4;FC:15;I20:11;50+:15;BLK:0
RB: #35 CHRIS MARTINEZ 5-11; 195 (FR.)
G:5;ATT:1;YDS:56;LNG:56;AVG:56.0;TB:0;FC:0;I20:1;50+:1;BLK:0
P: #81 BRODY MCNEW 6-2; 175 (SO.)
G:1;ATT:1;YDS:36;LNG:36;AVG:36.0;TB:0;FC:0;I20:0;50+:0;BLK:0

K: #41 CHRIS CAMPOS 5-11; 255 (SR.)
G:11;FGA:19;FGM:17;LNG:43;EXPA:49;EXPM:49
K: #40 JACOB HAND 5-10; 160 (R/FR.)
G:11;KO:76;YDS:4,744;AVG:63.0;TB:43;OB:3
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.