2025 NCAA Division I (FCS) PLAYOFFS

12,439 Views | 226 Replies | Last: 8 min ago by SFAXE93
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks4460
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFAJack_76 said:

NCAA gets a cut of the sold ticket revenue for the playoff games. Report 12,000, and they want their cut for 12,000. There are other wrinkles also. Attendance numbers are subject to be audited.

76 is spot on..


Jacks4460
How long do you want to ignore this user?
14jacks said:

SFAJack_76 said:

NCAA gets a cut of the sold ticket revenue for the playoff games. Report 12,000, and they want their cut for 12,000. There are other wrinkles also. Attendance numbers are subject to be audited.




Didn't we under report during season too? Does NCAA get a cut of that?

Also we've got UT money now. Lol.


Some things are for sure better but our athletic dept still survives on private funds because we have no athletic fee on our students bills.. Most every other school has these charges at registration but we don't.. Hopefully we will be going through the right process of getting it added.. Our faculty should be getting paid more now that we are part of UT which is so much deserved but it really doesn't help that much with athletics until we start charging a fee like other schools.. For example I believe Tarletons ath dept gets roughly 10mil more per year than us because of those fees.
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
14jacks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks4460 said:

14jacks said:

SFAJack_76 said:

NCAA gets a cut of the sold ticket revenue for the playoff games. Report 12,000, and they want their cut for 12,000. There are other wrinkles also. Attendance numbers are subject to be audited.




Didn't we under report during season too? Does NCAA get a cut of that?

Also we've got UT money now. Lol.


Some things are for sure better but our athletic dept still survives on private funds because we have no athletic fee on our students bills.. Most every other school has these charges at registration but we don't.. Hopefully we will be going through the right process of getting it added.. Our faculty should be getting paid more now that we are part of UT which is so much deserved but it really doesn't help that much with athletics until we start charging a fee like other schools.. For example I believe Tarletons ath dept gets roughly 10mil more per year than us because of those fees.


Good to know. Yeah I think I vaguely remember a vote for adding the athletic fees not getting passed a few years back but I could be wrong. That definitely makes sense though.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
14jacks said:

Jacks4460 said:

14jacks said:

SFAJack_76 said:

NCAA gets a cut of the sold ticket revenue for the playoff games. Report 12,000, and they want their cut for 12,000. There are other wrinkles also. Attendance numbers are subject to be audited.




Didn't we under report during season too? Does NCAA get a cut of that?

Also we've got UT money now. Lol.


Some things are for sure better but our athletic dept still survives on private funds because we have no athletic fee on our students bills.. Most every other school has these charges at registration but we don't.. Hopefully we will be going through the right process of getting it added.. Our faculty should be getting paid more now that we are part of UT which is so much deserved but it really doesn't help that much with athletics until we start charging a fee like other schools.. For example I believe Tarletons ath dept gets roughly 10mil more per year than us because of those fees.


Good to know. Yeah I think I vaguely remember a vote for adding the athletic fees not getting passed a few years back but I could be wrong. That definitely makes sense though.


The vote has been up and voted down every couple of years for at least well over a decade now. The bad thing is the students don't know what they're voting against.

I talked to a few students at the playoff game specifically about the athletic fee, and they were all under the impression it was going to make SFA athletic events no longer free for students. They had no idea what it entailed.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFASawmillGuy said:

14jacks said:

Jacks4460 said:

14jacks said:

SFAJack_76 said:

NCAA gets a cut of the sold ticket revenue for the playoff games. Report 12,000, and they want their cut for 12,000. There are other wrinkles also. Attendance numbers are subject to be audited.




Didn't we under report during season too? Does NCAA get a cut of that?

Also we've got UT money now. Lol.


Some things are for sure better but our athletic dept still survives on private funds because we have no athletic fee on our students bills.. Most every other school has these charges at registration but we don't.. Hopefully we will be going through the right process of getting it added.. Our faculty should be getting paid more now that we are part of UT which is so much deserved but it really doesn't help that much with athletics until we start charging a fee like other schools.. For example I believe Tarletons ath dept gets roughly 10mil more per year than us because of those fees.


Good to know. Yeah I think I vaguely remember a vote for adding the athletic fees not getting passed a few years back but I could be wrong. That definitely makes sense though.


The vote has been up and voted down every couple of years for at least well over a decade now. The bad thing is the students don't know what they're voting against.

I talked to a few students at the playoff game specifically about the athletic fee, and they were all under the impression it was going to make SFA athletic events no longer free for students. They had no idea what it entailed.

To add also. People hear the term and fee and instantly vote no. They need to do a better job of explaining the fee and how it can help, instead of just saying "Please vote for this." Every time, it'll fail. Also, not requiring seniors to vote for it would help when it does not affect them.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ya the last attempt iirc was a like one week crap show where they hoped students really wouldn't pay attention to pass it.

And I can understand why students are balking at any additional fees with today's uni prices.
14jacks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like we need to go set up some tents on campus for a few weeks and educate some folks
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jboy93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TallTexan said:

Ya the last attempt iirc was a like one week crap show where they hoped students really wouldn't pay attention to pass it.

And I can understand why students are balking at any additional fees with today's uni prices.

This is what I found for UT students:

Texas Longhorn students don't pay a separate mandatory athletic fee but can purchase the Big Ticket, an optional sports pass for access to events, which costs $250 (with football) or $100 (without football) for the 2025-26 year, with no extra processing fees for these prices. While older information mentioned a $175 fee plus processing, the current "Big Ticket" is a flat rate for all home regular season sports, including football, basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball.

Are we asking students to do something different?
Jacks6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jboy93 said:

TallTexan said:

Ya the last attempt iirc was a like one week crap show where they hoped students really wouldn't pay attention to pass it.

And I can understand why students are balking at any additional fees with today's uni prices.

This is what I found for UT students:

Texas Longhorn students don't pay a separate mandatory athletic fee but can purchase the Big Ticket, an optional sports pass for access to events, which costs $250 (with football) or $100 (without football) for the 2025-26 year, with no extra processing fees for these prices. While older information mentioned a $175 fee plus processing, the current "Big Ticket" is a flat rate for all home regular season sports, including football, basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball.

Are we asking students to do something different?

We don't ask our students to do anything. Last I knew, students got in free to all sporting events.

Could be wrong now, though.
"I'm jacked up...literally." Colby Carthel
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks6 said:

jboy93 said:

TallTexan said:

Ya the last attempt iirc was a like one week crap show where they hoped students really wouldn't pay attention to pass it.

And I can understand why students are balking at any additional fees with today's uni prices.

This is what I found for UT students:

Texas Longhorn students don't pay a separate mandatory athletic fee but can purchase the Big Ticket, an optional sports pass for access to events, which costs $250 (with football) or $100 (without football) for the 2025-26 year, with no extra processing fees for these prices. While older information mentioned a $175 fee plus processing, the current "Big Ticket" is a flat rate for all home regular season sports, including football, basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball.

Are we asking students to do something different?

We don't ask our students to do anything. Last I knew, students got in free to all sporting events.

Could be wrong now, though.

It was free the last time I was there five years ago. I still don't think they have changed it. This is more of a fee that would be added to tuition, at around $50-100, to provide a secondary revenue stream. Hell, even my graduate did a fee called Michigan Tech Experience, which was $100, but optional, but let you in all games for free anywhere.
jboy93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Read an article from the Bozeman Daily Chronicle that said we pulled out of a home and home agreement to play them in 2024 resulting in us paying $150k. Is that true and if so why did we pull out of that agreement?
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jboy93 said:

Read an article from the Bozeman Daily Chronicle that said we pulled out of a home and home agreement to play them in 2024 resulting in us paying $150k. Is that true and if so why did we pull out of that agreement?


That was right after McBroom and co moved us to the SLC. Don't know for sure, but my guess is that we had to accommodate the SLC schedule and moving stuff around was part of the deal
14jacks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigJack85 said:

jboy93 said:

Read an article from the Bozeman Daily Chronicle that said we pulled out of a home and home agreement to play them in 2024 resulting in us paying $150k. Is that true and if so why did we pull out of that agreement?


That was right after McBroom and co moved us to the SLC. Don't know for sure, but my guess is that we had to accommodate the SLC schedule and moving stuff around was part of the deal


This is correct. From the research I've gathered, we had to make room for an extra SLC game or something along those lines. All the Montana State fans are using it as trash talk. Lol
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.