NCAA FOOTBALL 2025

3,020 Views | 38 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by SFAJack_76
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
0-3 "SH will return to prominence!" ROFL!!!!!!!!!
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFA Jack Fanatic said:

0-3 "SH will return to prominence!" ROFL!!!!!!!!!


We need a few wins. Then I'll be laughing. A little.
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
AxeEm99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey if this is actually the case (which I doubt) we should be spending a lot more on a QUALITY AND PROVEN Leader for the program. SH paid $150k more that SFA for a proven winner of a coach in 2020 WHO DELIVERED RESULTS with a lower budget??? Laughable and doubtful!!

BTW, SH got a monstrous return on that investment!! All I can say is JOB WELL DONE!!
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AxeEm99 said:

Hey if this is actually the case (which I doubt) we should be spending a lot more on a QUALITY AND PROVEN Leader for the program. SH paid $150k more that SFA for a proven winner of a coach in 2020 WHO DELIVERED RESULTS with a lower budget??? Laughable and doubtful!!

BTW, SH got a monstrous return on that investment!! All I can say is JOB WELL DONE!!

You continue to tout the "spend money to make money" mantra. At some level, I agree. You've done a decent job of laying out expenses. You have not made any comment about where you believe this money that SFA has not spent should have come from.

Sam has the third lowest athletic department budget in FBS. Have you seen the abomination of a "pitch" that soccer plays on? It's dangerous at best. They attempted to increase the student athletic fee. They are in serious need of increasing revenue. As is, SFA.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.