I am not familiar with how companies like Under Armour, Nike, Adidas and their sponsorship works with college athletics other than they supply gear for the teams and what I have heard about the FBI prob into Adidas.
I noticed that TAM-CC is with Adidas. I was curious if it matters which one you are with.
For example if Nike and Adidas seem to be 2 of the largest and Adidas is telling Kansas you are our top priority (as noted in the trails) then are you better off with Under Armour who does not have as big of a presence with the top teams so maybe we are not playing second fiddle to team like Kansas. At the same time I have heard that being with say Nike you have a good shot at recruiting kids that are in Nike's EYBL (legally of course).
Just curious if the apparel company matters for SFA for recruiting, marketing and for the program as a whole.
I noticed that TAM-CC is with Adidas. I was curious if it matters which one you are with.
For example if Nike and Adidas seem to be 2 of the largest and Adidas is telling Kansas you are our top priority (as noted in the trails) then are you better off with Under Armour who does not have as big of a presence with the top teams so maybe we are not playing second fiddle to team like Kansas. At the same time I have heard that being with say Nike you have a good shot at recruiting kids that are in Nike's EYBL (legally of course).
Just curious if the apparel company matters for SFA for recruiting, marketing and for the program as a whole.