2025-26 SLC Men's Basketball Tournament

5,676 Views | 186 Replies | Last: 57 min ago by SCH890
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ljax1979 said:

Sent a note to Anthony Goss, Director of Communications and Broadcast, at the Southland Conference asking if he personally could talk with the on-site production staff with ESPN to change our name from SF Austin to SFA for the women's and men's games. Not sure why this is so hard. Last thing our school should want is to be listed as something we aren't. It would be like Louisiana State University being listed as La. State University. It's way past time that this should be fixed.

ESPN's refusal to switch from "SF Austin" to "SFA" is primarily due to their reliance on legacy data systems and search-driven metadata requirements that prioritize clarity for casual viewers over official school branding.

Why the Change Hasn't Happened
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO): ESPN's internal data providers often use "SF Austin" because casual fans searching for the school frequently use "Austin" as a keyword. Removing "Austin" from the metadata could, in their view, reduce the game's discoverability for people who don't know the "SFA" acronym.
  • Legacy Infrastructure: ESPN uses standardized databases where team names are often capped at specific character lengths or fixed to "Display Names" created decades ago. Updating these requires a massive overhaul of their score bug graphics, API endpoints, and app architecture across all sports, not just basketball.
  • Geographic Clarification: Ironically, while SFA wants to avoid being confused with the city of Austin (since they are in Nacogdoches), ESPN's style guide often mandates including the city or full name for "Mid-Major" schools to help viewers identify where the school is located.
  • The "Formal Process" Gap: SFA officials have stated they have tried "every formal process" for over 10 years without success. While CBS and Turner Sports successfully made the switch to "SFA" after the school's tournament runs in 2014 and 2016, ESPN has remained the lone holdout among major broadcast partners.
It's the classic "we're too big to care" corporate stubbornness. Even though SFA has established itself as a mid-major powerhouse, ESPN treats them like a data point in a spreadsheet rather than a brand with a specific identity.

By refusing to update the metadata, they're effectively telling fans in Nacogdoches (and everywhere else) that their "internal standards" for casual viewers in New York or LA are more important than the actual name on the jersey. It's incredibly lazy for a multibillion-dollar network to let a simple name change become a decade-long hurdle.

The cold reality of the "SF Austin" situation:
  • Zero Incentive: Unless SFA moves to a "Power" conference where they have more leverage (like the Big 12 or SEC), ESPN has very little financial motivation to manual-correct their legacy database.
  • The "Mid-Major" Filter: They treat the Southland Conference as a "tier 3" property, meaning the level of care put into their app's metadata for these games is the bare minimum.
  • Outdated Style Guides: ESPN's editors often stick to the AP Stylebook, which historically preferred city-based identifiers for schools, even if the school isn't in that city.
"History has no rubbish heap." Louis Blake Duff
migata33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have to finish the story today. Beating McNeese on their own court by double digits is the ending we all need. In all seriousness...great season and whatever happens we get bonus ball!! Hell of a comeback year!! Go Jacks!!
ljax1979
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank you! From an SFA and conference standpoint I just don't understand how it's not in our best interest to keep asking about this. It's not a hard change...heck we do it on our ESPN+ broadcasts. Imagine any other school being okay with not being listed as they are generally referred to. I'll stop being the old man shouting at the clouds but I just see this as a big marketing loss for our school.
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just my opinion, but much ado about nothing.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Larry Johnson is a beast. Got to contain him. Need some outside help we didn't get too much of last night from Kam and Narit.
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Larry Johnson is a beast. Got to contain him. Need some outside help we didn't get too much of last night from Kam and Narit.


Nailed it.
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Larry Johnson is a beast. Got to contain him. Need some outside help we didn't get too much of last night from Kam and Narit.

Johnson is a beast, but he also plays out of control at times. Need defensive discipline!
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man, it sucks this game is at 4 and I am still at work.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very slow start as everyone is amped. 2-2 after 4 minutes.
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Larry Johnson forearm shiver
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is going to be a long game if we just hit long twos.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
17-13 McNeese at second media. Need some perimeter D. They didn't shoot the three well when we beat them.
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Colbert moving screen opens it up for Garcia. Refs letting a lot go
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
McNeese not looking like they just played 3 OTs.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TallTexan said:

McNeese not looking like they just played 3 OTs.

Honestly mostly Garcia for them. If we can get him out of it. We could be better off.
Oak19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another day, another team shooting lights out from three against us
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
29-20 McNeese third media. New plan - let Garcia take all the shots.
Jacks4460
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All his shots are uncontested too..
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks4460 said:

All his shots are uncontested too..

Ugh. Frustrating...
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Update: after 3 overtime's last night, McNeese is not tired.
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welp.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
42-25 McNeese at half. If Corpus had a dream half for them last night, McNeese dreams bigger.

As ugly as it gets. It's like we have never run offense before.
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Terrible first half. They shoot 56% , 55% from three. We're at 28%
Keep the faith. This is a test of character. No matter how it ends, let's see some fight.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely doesn't hurt that McNeese is playing in their home arena. That crowd is electric, and forcing the momentum in their favor. It's almost like letting a team host the entire tournament wasn't the best idea.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As the old saying goes, one guy is not going to beat you. And that's true. If it was just one guy against us it would be tied 25-25.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stats are about as bad as they come. Not winning from any angle except turnovers 4 to their 5. But if we only force 5 turnovers next half then we're sunk.

Our shooters have to shoot. They are long and quick but not so fast we can't find a shot. Jacks have to do a lot better. Get it under 10 by 10 minutes and chip away.
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Stats are about as bad as they come. Not winning from any angle except turnovers 4 to their 5. But if we only force 5 turnovers next half then we're sunk.

Our shooters have to shoot. They are long and quick but not so fast we can't find a shot. Jacks have to do a lot better. Get it under 10 by 10 minutes and chip away.


They have to move the ball and set more off ball screens to get their shooters open. Only set I see is high ball screen while the shooters are standing around.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
50-34 McNeese U16. SFA won the four minutes by one point.

Got to find some defense because we have none right now.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFASawmillGuy said:

Definitely doesn't hurt that McNeese is playing in their home arena. That crowd is electric, and forcing the momentum in their favor. It's almost like letting a team host the entire tournament wasn't the best idea.

1000% Only way to get the crowd out of it. But then again, 5,200 fans and probably about 200 SFA fans, I bet. You just can't
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If we can get rolling (somehow), those late night legs will start to be felt.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Down 20 off of a terrible play. Please if you lose the ball just let it go out of bounds instead of throwing it to a fast break.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

If we can get rolling (somehow), those late night legs will start to be felt.


I think they somehow swapped them out with ours.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's go Narit. Start shooting.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
59-41 McNeese U12. Got to work to get to 10 points down. McNeese hitting everything. They're staying at twice as many rebounds as we have.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wheels are absolutely falling off. Simple ball handling is becoming a challenge. Not much more to say about this one.

The top 25 curse strikes again.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.