2025-26 SLC Men's Basketball Tournament

3,647 Views | 124 Replies | Last: 8 min ago by SFASawmillGuy
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ljax1979 said:

Sent a note to Anthony Goss, Director of Communications and Broadcast, at the Southland Conference asking if he personally could talk with the on-site production staff with ESPN to change our name from SF Austin to SFA for the women's and men's games. Not sure why this is so hard. Last thing our school should want is to be listed as something we aren't. It would be like Louisiana State University being listed as La. State University. It's way past time that this should be fixed.

ESPN's refusal to switch from "SF Austin" to "SFA" is primarily due to their reliance on legacy data systems and search-driven metadata requirements that prioritize clarity for casual viewers over official school branding.

Why the Change Hasn't Happened
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO): ESPN's internal data providers often use "SF Austin" because casual fans searching for the school frequently use "Austin" as a keyword. Removing "Austin" from the metadata could, in their view, reduce the game's discoverability for people who don't know the "SFA" acronym.
  • Legacy Infrastructure: ESPN uses standardized databases where team names are often capped at specific character lengths or fixed to "Display Names" created decades ago. Updating these requires a massive overhaul of their score bug graphics, API endpoints, and app architecture across all sports, not just basketball.
  • Geographic Clarification: Ironically, while SFA wants to avoid being confused with the city of Austin (since they are in Nacogdoches), ESPN's style guide often mandates including the city or full name for "Mid-Major" schools to help viewers identify where the school is located.
  • The "Formal Process" Gap: SFA officials have stated they have tried "every formal process" for over 10 years without success. While CBS and Turner Sports successfully made the switch to "SFA" after the school's tournament runs in 2014 and 2016, ESPN has remained the lone holdout among major broadcast partners.
It's the classic "we're too big to care" corporate stubbornness. Even though SFA has established itself as a mid-major powerhouse, ESPN treats them like a data point in a spreadsheet rather than a brand with a specific identity.

By refusing to update the metadata, they're effectively telling fans in Nacogdoches (and everywhere else) that their "internal standards" for casual viewers in New York or LA are more important than the actual name on the jersey. It's incredibly lazy for a multibillion-dollar network to let a simple name change become a decade-long hurdle.

The cold reality of the "SF Austin" situation:
  • Zero Incentive: Unless SFA moves to a "Power" conference where they have more leverage (like the Big 12 or SEC), ESPN has very little financial motivation to manual-correct their legacy database.
  • The "Mid-Major" Filter: They treat the Southland Conference as a "tier 3" property, meaning the level of care put into their app's metadata for these games is the bare minimum.
  • Outdated Style Guides: ESPN's editors often stick to the AP Stylebook, which historically preferred city-based identifiers for schools, even if the school isn't in that city.
"History has no rubbish heap." Louis Blake Duff
migata33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have to finish the story today. Beating McNeese on their own court by double digits is the ending we all need. In all seriousness...great season and whatever happens we get bonus ball!! Hell of a comeback year!! Go Jacks!!
ljax1979
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank you! From an SFA and conference standpoint I just don't understand how it's not in our best interest to keep asking about this. It's not a hard change...heck we do it on our ESPN+ broadcasts. Imagine any other school being okay with not being listed as they are generally referred to. I'll stop being the old man shouting at the clouds but I just see this as a big marketing loss for our school.
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just my opinion, but much ado about nothing.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Larry Johnson is a beast. Got to contain him. Need some outside help we didn't get too much of last night from Kam and Narit.
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Larry Johnson is a beast. Got to contain him. Need some outside help we didn't get too much of last night from Kam and Narit.


Nailed it.
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Larry Johnson is a beast. Got to contain him. Need some outside help we didn't get too much of last night from Kam and Narit.

Johnson is a beast, but he also plays out of control at times. Need defensive discipline!
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man, it sucks this game is at 4 and I am still at work.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very slow start as everyone is amped. 2-2 after 4 minutes.
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Larry Johnson forearm shiver
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is going to be a long game if we just hit long twos.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
17-13 McNeese at second media. Need some perimeter D. They didn't shoot the three well when we beat them.
RichieVan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Colbert moving screen opens it up for Garcia. Refs letting a lot go
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
McNeese not looking like they just played 3 OTs.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TallTexan said:

McNeese not looking like they just played 3 OTs.

Honestly mostly Garcia for them. If we can get him out of it. We could be better off.
Oak19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another day, another team shooting lights out from three against us
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
29-20 McNeese third media. New plan - let Garcia take all the shots.
Jacks4460
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All his shots are uncontested too..
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks4460 said:

All his shots are uncontested too..

Ugh. Frustrating...
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Update: after 3 overtime's last night, McNeese is not tired.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.