SFA / McNeese

2,068 Views | 79 Replies | Last: 19 hrs ago by BigJack85
Jacks1989
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:40p, 1/5/26
The Jacks had too many missed opportunities. Should have won the game.
Reply Quote
4
No-look
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:46p, 1/5/26
We had our chances in last two minutes but shots just wouldn't fall. Kudos to the Cowboys. They did what it takes. We turned the ball over 15 times. But they forced the turnovers.
Reply Quote
1
SCH890
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:50p, 1/5/26
Didn't have a change to watch it. But to sum it up seems like we missed our chances when we could have made it. But hey at least we kept within the 2 when Vegas had it at 10(????). Time keep the foot on the gas and beat them when they come back to our house later in the year.
Reply Quote
1
nacluth
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:51p, 1/5/26
I thought it was a solid game overall against a good team. Johnson and Garcia looked like P4 type players. As billed, they were the best team that we have played this year.

We had some great shooting early. They adjusted for the most part after some early threes in the second half. We did not have a paint presence offensively, and they looked more active defensively.

I thought Braeuer had a winning game plan, but kind of like in the Fresno State game, we just didn't execute well in the final two minutes. But it should have been made clear in the timeout exactly what to do with the rebound on a missed free throw.

Solid game. We played well, they played well. Nothing to hang any heads over.
Reply Quote
4
BigJack85
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nacluth • 9:09p, 1/5/26
nacluth said:
I thought it was a solid game overall against a good team. Johnson and Garcia looked like P4 type players. As billed, they were the best team that we have played this year.

We had some great shooting early. They adjusted for the most part after some early threes in the second half. We did not have a paint presence offensively, and they looked more active defensively.

I thought Braeuer had a winning game plan, but kind of like in the Fresno State game, we just didn't execute well in the final two minutes. But it should have been made clear in the timeout exactly what to do with the rebound on a missed free throw.

Solid game. We played well, they played well. Nothing to hang any heads over.


Nailed it.
Reply Quote
1
SCH890
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nacluth • 9:13p, 1/5/26
nacluth said:
Colonel had no clue what to do with that ball. That's on the coach. Great game. I wanted it, but fine with this outcome. We'll get it at home.

Watched the end. I honestly don't think Colonel think he would get the ball with so much time left to send a buzzer beater from basically the charity stripe. Don't think there was much hope there haha.
Reply Quote
No-look
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:17a, 1/6/26
Lots of positives. Game could have went either way at their place. We are still in good shape to win the conference. McNeese will probably lose a couple more road games. We just have to take care of business….but when will Nicholls start getting some respect? lol
Reply Quote
1 edit
nacluth
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to No-look • 12:00p, 1/6/26
Nicholls has a pretty tough four game stretch on their hands. If they fare well against those games (McNeese and us included), then they can have respect.

I don't see McNeese losing too many games, but here's for hoping.
Reply Quote
3
SFAXE93
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:35p, 1/6/26
Reply Quote
2
BigJack85
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to No-look • 8:57p, 1/6/26
No-look said:
Lots of positives. Game could have went either way at their place. We are still in good shape to win the conference. McNeese will probably lose a couple more road games. We just have to take care of business….but when will Nicholls start getting some respect? lol


Agree. It's unlikely that McNeese go through without any more losses. I think they lose 3 total in conference. We've gone through our toughest stretch imo. UIW will be a challenge. Nicholls.

I think we go 19-3 in conference. Could have an unpredictable loss and go 18-4 in conference. 18-4 +7-2 =25-6. If you gave me that number at the beginning of the year I'd say you were optimistic. Now, it seems very likely.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.