Head Coach Search for MBB

3,295 Views | 58 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by BigJack85
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cool, Jim Boeheim and David Bailiff are on the team.
"History has no rubbish heap." Louis Blake Duff
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFAJack_76 said:

Same group that did the AD and baseball HC searches.



Do we have to pay the fee if we hire the West Texas A&M coach?

Bc so far their MO is "hire the guys I used to work with" and honestly, any one of us could have come up with that strategy as a search firm.
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would be interesting to see how many and who applied.
"History has no rubbish heap." Louis Blake Duff
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TallTexan said:

SFAJack_76 said:

Same group that did the AD and baseball HC searches.



Do we have to pay the fee if we hire the West Texas A&M coach?

Bc so far their MO is "hire the guys I used to work with" and honestly, any one of us could have come up with that strategy as a search firm.


The search firm is more symbolic than anything. It's the University's way of saying "Noooo, we don't already have our mind made up, it'll definitely be an extensive and fair search with a lot of candidates".

That's not a knock on the University if we do already have our mind made up. But it's doesn't give a good picture of our new AD if it looks like he's just going to fire coaches and hire his old guys without any consideration.
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he is interested, is Brown a legitimate candidate? Based on his resume', of course he is. Is he the best candidate available? Without doing a search, we don't know. It would be really bad business when hiring for one of most visible and important jobs in SFA athletics, and arguably at SFA, if a national search wasn't done. I have great confidence that the search is not just for optics.
jboy93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They knew exactly who they wanted to hire the day Keller was let go. The "search" has to be done but rest assured the man they want has the job already. After going through this on a smaller scale, the powers that be are ready to sign with their man on the dotted line once the "search" is complete!
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jboy93 said:

They knew exactly who they wanted to hire the day Keller was let go. The "search" has to be done but rest assured the man they want has the job already. After going through this on a smaller scale, the powers that be are ready to sign with their man on the dotted line once the "search" is complete!
I do agree we already have an idea of who we wanted. Since we did fire Keller middle of the season. As much as people may groan that McBroom is hiring his own guys I would say just ignore baseball because who actually would want to take over SFA baseball program? lol no one thats who.

Basketball is its own breed in of itself. We really know that Brown from WTAMU really is the slam dunk canidate besides a few that are former SFA Assistants.


In short I do hope this is the sign that we may sign Tom Brown from WTAMU. Basketball is to vitale of a sport for SFA to get some random guy who interviews well. Rather getting someone with decorated experience and transforming that into another SLC title and tournament winning for SFA.
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jboy93 said:

They knew exactly who they wanted to hire the day Keller was let go. The "search" has to be done but rest assured the man they want has the job already. After going through this on a smaller scale, the powers that be are ready to sign with their man on the dotted line once the "search" is complete!
If this was accurate, which it isn't, it would be short sighted to put potential candidates through the recruiting and interview process. The university would get a very negative reputation. The candidate pool for the next opening would be weak at best.

If Brown is the next MBB HC, it's because he's the best candidate, not because it was predetermined.
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So what are the things committees look for other than a win/loss record? I have few but would like to hear others ideas.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No-look said:

So what are the things committees look for other than a win/loss record? I have few but would like to hear others ideas.
Win/Loss
Recruiting
Success in Post Season
Staff they build around them.
jboy93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFAJack_76 said:

jboy93 said:

They knew exactly who they wanted to hire the day Keller was let go. The "search" has to be done but rest assured the man they want has the job already. After going through this on a smaller scale, the powers that be are ready to sign with their man on the dotted line once the "search" is complete!
If this was accurate, which it isn't, it would be short sighted to put potential candidates through the recruiting and interview process. The university would get a very negative reputation. The candidate pool for the next opening would be weak at best.

If Brown is the next MBB HC, it's because he's the best candidate, not because it was predetermined.
Happens all the time unfortunately. College and pros! We can all agree to disagree!
AxeEm99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jboy93 said:

SFAJack_76 said:

jboy93 said:

They knew exactly who they wanted to hire the day Keller was let go. The "search" has to be done but rest assured the man they want has the job already. After going through this on a smaller scale, the powers that be are ready to sign with their man on the dotted line once the "search" is complete!
If this was accurate, which it isn't, it would be short sighted to put potential candidates through the recruiting and interview process. The university would get a very negative reputation. The candidate pool for the next opening would be weak at best.

If Brown is the next MBB HC, it's because he's the best candidate, not because it was predetermined.
Happens all the time unfortunately. College and pros! We can all agree to disagree!


I have seen this playout many times at the University and college level. The AD already has his man!

At my previous employer, at the college level, there was a national search for a vice chancellor position. My personal friend was reccomended for the job by the search firm. (He was employed at a nearby University). The Chancellor of the College had a personal friend at a different University that got the job AFTER the search firm announced the lone finalist for the position to the staff

Whoever it is, hopefully our new coach will bring success!
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm assuming that the hire will be made immediately after the bb season?
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No-look said:

I'm assuming that the hire will be made immediately after the bb season?
Thats what McBroom said. He would be ready to hire as soon as the conference tourney is over.
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Brown is eventually hired I'd personally have a bad taste in my mouth about the 'selection' process. It would carry the stinch of simply another buddy promotion. There are hundreds of MBB programs around the country. The search team would have a hard time convincing me that out of those hundreds of programs and probably several dozen applicants that Brown would magically be the one who floated to the top to be our saviour. If it happens and he turns out to be a great fit for our program, then I'll have a great feast while eating lots of crow.
cboothe09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Search firms are used so if the hire fails, the school points to the firm and says that's who they recommended. Some places follow the firm, others don't. Livingston used a search firm for their new AD/HFC, but ultimately chose someone else.
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Arkansas State extended their coach.

That's over $600,000 a year. A lot more than Keller was making.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So I want to just make this point. If we hire Brown, that's not a bad hire. He's a phenomenal coach with a great resume and I think he'd have success at SFA.

I don't like the whole "it's who you know" hiring mechanic a lot of programs, both pro and college, use, but I think it's what we might be headed towards.

Regardless, if we do hire Brown as we expect, I won't be disappointed and think he will do a good job.
jboy93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cboothe09 said:

Search firms are used so if the hire fails, the school points to the firm and says that's who they recommended. Some places follow the firm, others don't. Livingston used a search firm for their new AD/HFC, but ultimately chose someone else.
I am personally aware of this situation and it was all about who the guy knew! The "good ol' boy network" working at it's best!
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The "it's who you know" thing works well when the hire is above average (most of the time). Lateral moves not so much.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've been on and around hiring search committees. Some were great, most were just ok, some were terrible. The singular determining factor for good hires was not what kind of candidates were available, but how good the hiring committee was at hiring people.

I don't know enough about McBroom and his previous hires, but some people have a gift with finding good hires, some don't. Most throw a dart at the best on-paper resume/reputation. Good luck to the Jacks.
ljax1979
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unless I am mistaken, this is the same firm SFA used for the AD search.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ljax1979 said:

Unless I am mistaken, this is the same firm SFA used for the AD search.
It was the same one for Baseball. Not sure if AD was the same.
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

I've been on and around hiring search committees. Some were great, most were just ok, some were terrible. The singular determining factor for good hires was not what kind of candidates were available, but how good the hiring committee was at hiring people.

I don't know enough about McBroom and his previous hires, but some people have a gift with finding good hires, some don't. Most throw a dart at the best on-paper resume/reputation. Good luck to the Jacks.


All good points, and accurate from the experience I've had.

Observations about McBroom and some situational thoughts.

*** He seems to me more risk averse, than say Ryan Ivey…. Stating the obvious.

1. The move back to the Southland was made above him (Weaver/Milliken). That being said, McBroom doesn't seem to have "starry eyes" for the Mountain West Conference or other far flung enterprise we might find. Certainly without deeper analysis/commitment. What I'm saying is that his decision making process is very sober

2. Upheaval in college athletics will continue. Instability reigns. Making a safe hire, for our flagship program, may be the most sensible approach.

3. Our combination of men's basketball history/facilities and institutional commitment to athletics says, all things being equal (with a above average coach) we should always be in the top 4-5 in the league. Tom Brown has, if anything been a consistent winner. One thing that makes me discount his success (slightly) is that WTAM is already built like a D1 school playing in a D2 league. It's easier to win when you're well resourced.

4. If we are willing to take more risk, we should consider successful guys at places like Nicholls St or the SWAC. If they can succeed with barely D1 facilities and support, maybe they could elevate a program like SFA
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.