Lamar

29,638 Views | 119 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by Bighamp
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. Same angles in the stadium.
MasterAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me guess, "the refs suck."

Perhaps. But so does our oline, playcalling etc...play better in the 1st half and we don't have to complain about refs missing calls.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clearly not down. Knee caught on top of the other player.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He landed on the defender on his backside. If his knee was down when he fumbled, they'd have to cart him off with a broken leg.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can't advance a fumble on offense.
Edit: you can. Just grumbling about all those years of no fumble movement. And the crappy TD.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That play completely changed the course of this game.
MasterAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The refs are clearly the reason we've allowed 200+ rushing yards to a QB.
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok, another horrible call for their touchdown. And no review. This is horrible beyond belief
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So I thought a fumble into the end zone could only be recovered by the fumbler? Is that just pros? And btw his knee WAS down on that one
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MasterAxe said:

The refs are clearly the reason we've allowed 200+ rushing yards to a QB.


No but they are the reason this is a 17 point game instead of 3.
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a horse collar. No flag of course
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
MasterAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedRiverLa said:

MasterAxe said:

The refs are clearly the reason we've allowed 200+ rushing yards to a QB.


No but they are the reason this is a 17 point game instead of 3.


Bad calls? Absolutely. But, did you have any confidence we would score on the possession anyway? We're so inept, I doubt we'd have scored.
drhuggybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Okay so any recommendations for dinner after the game?
Jeff
Axe'Em Jacks
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MasterAxe said:

RedRiverLa said:

MasterAxe said:

The refs are clearly the reason we've allowed 200+ rushing yards to a QB.


No but they are the reason this is a 17 point game instead of 3.


Bad calls? Absolutely. But, did you have any confidence we would score on the possession anyway? We're so inept, I doubt we'd have scored.


Yes! (No) That confidence is all I have left
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drhuggybear said:

Okay so any recommendations for dinner after the game?



Clear Springs
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hope we don't run the ball again this game.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jake took a shot there.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Making a game with points! Points! What do we do with these?!?
MasterAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's not the most physically gifted, but Jake Blumrick is a tough SOB.

I'm OK if he's our QB next year.

Get a new system with some better blocking schemes to protect him, and I'm good with him.

Love his toughness.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jake is literally going to be crippled when he leaves SFA.
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not sold on him, but his progression has been impressive. If he can learn to make reads more consistently and look downfield, he can succeed. If we go back to an air raid I bet he'd excel. I think the athleticism and arm is there. Just a mental component missing. For now.
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If we had an iron man award, it would be Jakes, no question
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
MasterAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFA_03 said:

I'm not sold on him, but his progression has been impressive. If he can learn to make reads more consistently and look downfield, he can succeed. If we go back to an air raid I bet he'd excel. I think the athleticism and arm is there. Just a mental component missing. For now.


I can agree with this. I think we've got other serious areas of need that if he was QB next year, I'd be ok, as long as some upgrades around him are made
MasterAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hate that I'm so emotionally invested in a bad 2-win team.

Stupid fandom.
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lamar showing little to no class after the game.
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MasterAxe said:

He's not the most physically gifted, but Jake Blumrick is a tough SOB.

I'm OK if he's our QB next year.

Get a new system with some better blocking schemes to protect him, and I'm good with hi

Love his toughness.


Agree 100%. When he had time he had some beautifully on target passes. And I hate to bring up the refs, but...refs, geez.
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
SFASawmillGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree with a statement Isaac said earlier. Before the Clint Conque fiasco, this was a team that could've competed for a conference title. As it stands, we are a 2 win team, and likely going to finish at best a 3 win team unless we can upset Nicholls.

I've said all season and I'll continue to say this team is way too talented to be this bad. Even the offensive line issues can be fixed with proper adjustments or scheme changes. The play calling right now is atrocious. Our defense is our saving grace.

Both Foster and Jake were thrown into a no win situation, and it really sucks because I think Foster could've been a top 5 QB in this league. As for Jake, I applaud how he's handled the situation. He's really making strides. I still struggle to say he's a D-1 starting QB, but he definitely is close, and if he can work on his decision making, he may have a magical senior season.

I hope Ryan Ivey makes a good hire. We shouldn't be a team that has to worry about anyone. Teams should worry about us.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedRiverLa said:

drhuggybear said:

Okay so any recommendations for dinner after the game?



Clear Springs


A little late but my faves in town are Butcher Boys and Auntie Pastas.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We had a blast at homecoming.

Also stopped by the new Stem Building on the way out of town and saw that they were having a planetarium show. We went and it was pretty awesome! Highly recommend.
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So the VIP tent looked like a ghost town
most of the game. Other than this board, I saw nothing about it. It's a good idea, but needs to be promoted. And if this was a test run, you should have filled it just for appearances sake in front of such a good homecoming crowd to get the buzz going and to work out any service kinks. It kind of mirrored our football team...no one showed up until the second half.
Lumberjack Battalion
Lumberjacks make great US Army Special Ops Officers - AxeEm!
SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
QB: #10 Jake Blumrick 6-2; 206 (Jr.)
G:7;ATT:199;CMP:122;CP%:.58.0%;YDS:1465;TD:8;INT:5;RTD:1
QB: #12 Foster Sawyer 6-5; 225 (Sr.)
G:4;ATT:113;CMP:59;CP%:.51.5%;YDS:485;TD:3;INT:4
QB: #11 Josh Covey 6-1; 205 (Jr.)
G:8;ATT:9;CMP:4;CP%:.45%;YDS:26;TD:0;INT:0;R:11;YDS:23;TD:1

RB: #29 Josh McGowen 5-10; 222 (So.)
G:8;ATT:64;YDS:309;AVG:5.0;TD:1/REC:13;YDS:217;TD:2
RB: #32 Jamall Shaw 5-11; 210 (Jr.)
G:8;ATT:58;YDS:240;AVG:4.1;TD:1/REC:5;YDS:11;TD:0
RB: #28 Thomas Hutchings 5-10; 205 (Jr.)
G:8;ATT:25;YDS:200;AVG:8.0;TD:2/REC:3;YDS:21;TD:0
RB: #25 Jae'lon Oglesby 5-11; 175 (Jr.)
G:7;ATT:33;YDS:71;AVG:2.1;TD:0/REC:9;YDS:44;TD:0
RB: #20 Dominic Williams 5-11; 205 (R/Fr.)
G:7;ATT:32;YDS:41;AVG:1.3;TD:0/REC:1;YDS:6;TD:0

WR: #5 Terian Goree 6-1; 175 (Sr.)
G:8;REC:50;YDS:532;TD:2
WR: #9 Remi Simmons 5-11; 185 (So.)
G:8;REC:44;YDS:440;TD:1
WR: #80 Tamrick Pace 6-3; 195 (Jr.)
G:7;REC:27;YDS:420;TD:5
WR: #85 Quentyvian Q. Borders 6-2; 180 (Fr.)
G:6;REC:5;YDS:83;TD:0
WR: #2 Frank Iheanacho 6-6; 225 (Sr.)
G:8;REC:5;YDS:43;TD:1
WR: #82 Cody Williams 6-3; 210 (Jr.)
G:8;REC:5;YDS:36;TD:0
WR: #84 Lar'Darion Cobb 6-3; 205 (Jr.)
G:4;REC:2;YDS:20;TD:0
WR: #22 Josh Thompson 5-10; 185 (R/Fr.)
G:5;REC:3;YDS:10;TD:0
WR: #8 Calvin Clater 6-3; 200 (R/Fr.)
G:6;REC:1;YDS:9;TD:0
WR: #88 Dylan Parker 6-3; 212 (So.)
G:8;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
WR: #83 David Crenshaw 6-1; 195 (R/Fr.)
G:1;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
WR: #19 Thomas Nolley 6-3; 200 (R/Fr.)
G:1;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0

TE: #87 Allen Arclies III 6-4; 245 (So.)
G:7;REC:11;YDS:82;TD:0
TE: #89 Bryce Wempa 6-5; 255 (Jr.)
G:6;REC:2;YDS:6;TD:0
TE: #48 Barclay Ford 6-3; 235 (Fr.)
G:5;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
TE: #41 Tony Gilbert II 6-1; 255 (R/Fr.)
G:3;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0
TE: #86 Donte Coleman 6-4; 245 (So.)
G:3;REC:0;YDS:0;TD:0

OL: #65 Hayden Scott 6-2; 295 (Sr.) G:8
OL: #52 A.J. Brown 6-2; 316 (Jr.) G:8
OL: #72 Collin Lagarde 6-3; 317 (Jr.) G:8
OL: #71 Devonte Jones 6-3; 315 (Jr.) G:8
OL: #76 Cooper Williams 6-4; 312 (So.) G:7
OL: #75 Josiah Hunter 6-5; 322 (Sr.) G:7
OL: #78 Chett Munden 6-6; 305 (Jr.) G:6
OL: #55 Paul Hill 6-1; 295 (Jr.) G:6
OL: #73 Hayden Young 6-4; 297 (R/Fr.) G:5
OL: #66 Zach Mack 6-3; 312 (So.) G:4
OL: #61 Jerrod Johnson 6-2; 295 (So.) G:2
OL: #62 Nick Langlois 6-2; 268 (R/Fr.) G:1

K:#36 Storm Ruiz 5-10; 170 (Jr.)
G:8;FGA:8;FGM:6;FG%:75%;LNG:47;APAT:17;MPAT:17

LS:#51 Chris Wilkerson 6-2; 248 (Sr.) G:8















SFAXE93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DE:#57 Gary Sampson 6-3; 280 (Jr.)
G:7;TKL:12;TFL:2.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:2
DE:#96 Daniel Brewer 6-3; 243 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:5;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:2;INT:0;QBH:1
DE:#91 Holland Malone 6-5; 220 (R/Fr.)
G:4;TKL:3;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
DE:#98 Tyrell Buard 6-3; 245 (Fr.)
G:1;TKL:1;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0

DT:#90 Rayshad Nichols 6-3; 304 (So.)
G:8;TKL:25;TFL:5.0;SCK:3.5;FF:2;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:0;QBH:3
DT:#94 Demetrion Amie 6-5; 268 (Sr.)
G:8;TKL:24;TFL:6.0;SCK:4.5;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:0;QBH:3
DT:#60 Taaj Bakari 6-3; 335 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:11;TFL:3.5;SCK:1.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
DT:#99 Shaq Anderson 6-0; 305 (Sr.)
G:8;TKL:11;TFL:1.5;SCK:1.0;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:0;QBH:3
DT:#92 Larron Cox 6-2; 282 (So.)
G:8;TKL:8;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
DT:#95 Desmond Robinson 6-3; 266 (R/Fr.)
G:3;TKL:1;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0

LB:#50 Ryan Woods 6-0; 232 (Sr.)
G:8;TKL:47;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:4;INT:0;QBH:0
LB:#7 Quin Jones 6-0; 232 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:33;TFL:5.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:1;INT:1;QBH:3
LB:#43 Anthony Jacobs 5-11; 228 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:26;TFL:4.5;SCK:2.5;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:3
LB:#42 Teddy Britton 5-11; 222 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:22;TFL:4.5;SCK:1.5;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:1
LB:#44 Bert Morris 6-1; 224 (So.)
G:8;TKL:21;TFL:0.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
LB:#13 Kirkland Joseph 6-0; 215 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:17;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:1
LB:#17 Nazier Wright 6-2; 210 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:7;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
LB:#49 Terrance Potts 6-2; 234 (Sr.)
G:8;TKL:5;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
LB:#39 DaRyan Williams 5-11; 218 (Fr.)
G:2;TKL:1;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0

S:#33 Alize Ward 5-10; 190 (Jr.)
G:7;TKL:50;TFL:2.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#3 Lawrence Ghansah 6-0; 195 (Sr.)
G:8;TKL:40;TFL:1.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:1;QBH:0
S:#38 Trenton Gordon 5-11; 195 (So.)
G:8;TKL:39;TFL:2.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:3;PBU:4;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#4 Chris James 6-0; 200 (Sr.)
G:8;TKL:33;TFL:3.0;SCK:0.0;FF:2;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:1;QBH:2
S:#34 Gavin Roland 5-11; 195 (So.)
G:8;TKL:14;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#15 Jeremiah Davis 6-0; 180 (Fr.)
G:5;TKL:8;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#14 Trey Ramos 5-11; 192 (So.)
G:2;TKL:4;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:1;QBH:0
S:#35 Brody Anderson 5-10; 195 (Fr.)
G:2;TKL:0;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0

CB:#1 Aretavious Hendrix 6-1; 192 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:23;TFL:3.5;SCK:1.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:4;INT:0;QBH:0
CB:#23 Jadarius Byrd 5-10; 170 (Jr.)
G:7;TKL:14;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:0;QBH:0
CB:#21 Davelle Fox 5-11; 185 (Sr.)
G:8;TKL:11;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:0;QBH:0
CB:#31 Caleb Lawton 5-11; 175 (So.)
G:8;TKL:9;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:0;QBH:0
CB:#26 Eli Jones 5-10; 170 (So.)
G:8;TKL:7;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:1;QBH:0
CB:#27 Tedrick Hawkins 6-0; 170 (Sr.)
G:4;TKL:3;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
CB:#6 Tyler Freeman 6-2; 190 (Jr.)
G:8;TKL:2;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0

P:#45 Caleb Lewallen 5-10; 200 (Sr.)
G:8;P:66;YDS:2680;AVG:41.0.;LNG:62;IN20:21;TB:3
P:#40 Troy Duran 6-2; 185 (Jr.)
G:1;P:1;YDS:32;AVG:32;LNG:32;IN20:0;TB:0











TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Attendance question, do we count the group of people who watch from the tailgating area?
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedRiverLa said:

So the VIP tent looked like a ghost town
most of the game. Other than this board, I saw nothing about it. It's a good idea, but needs to be promoted. And if this was a test run, you should have filled it just for appearances sake in front of such a good homecoming crowd to get the buzz going and to work out any service kinks. It kind of mirrored our football team...no one showed up until the second half.
Think this vision:

https://letsgopeay.com/news/2017/7/19/athletics-APSU-Athletics-boxLIFE-team-up-to-provide-new-seating-area-at-Fortera-Stadium.aspx
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, why wasn't it at the other end? I went to the stadium the other day and looked at the tent. You couldn't see the big board, and your field level view from the end zone is not super conducive to watch all but the closest plays. The way it was set up was almost exclusively to be seen and not to experience. At least on the other end, you could watch the giant TV in the background.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.