Aside from recent tournament games, we got to see SFA basketball on easily accessible TV like SEC Network and ESPNU, what, three times?. Face it, ESPN3 is not real television, and how many of us have satellite or cable systems that carry the C-USA and Big South Networks? And I won't watch anything on Facebook Live as a matter of principal.
Meanwhile, in late January-early February I'm flipping around at night and run across...with startling regularity...games on ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPNU featuring lower-echelon East Coast and mid-Atlantic teams, Big South and SWAC teams, and so on, with power ratings in the mid 200's, sub .500 records, and maybe 400 people in the stands...350 if you take out the bands.
It can't be that such games are getting much in the way of ratings, but the networks are somehow convinced to air them anyway. Why?
I'm not the most media-savvy guy, so to all of you who know more...why do the networks schedule these games when they could at least air a game or two featuring SFA and/or 2 or 3 other SLC teams with better power ratings, more people in the stands, and maybe more excitement?
Shouldn't we expect the SLC to step up and advocate for (or pay for) getting more of its teams on these more accessible networks, more often? Is that the SLC's job or someone else's?
Meanwhile, in late January-early February I'm flipping around at night and run across...with startling regularity...games on ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPNU featuring lower-echelon East Coast and mid-Atlantic teams, Big South and SWAC teams, and so on, with power ratings in the mid 200's, sub .500 records, and maybe 400 people in the stands...350 if you take out the bands.
It can't be that such games are getting much in the way of ratings, but the networks are somehow convinced to air them anyway. Why?
I'm not the most media-savvy guy, so to all of you who know more...why do the networks schedule these games when they could at least air a game or two featuring SFA and/or 2 or 3 other SLC teams with better power ratings, more people in the stands, and maybe more excitement?
Shouldn't we expect the SLC to step up and advocate for (or pay for) getting more of its teams on these more accessible networks, more often? Is that the SLC's job or someone else's?
Scott Taylor
78230
78230