SFA / New Orleans

1,486 Views | 49 Replies | Last: 15 hrs ago by jboy93
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SC Top 10
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks move to 3-9 after Hayman hits a 2/3 court shot to keep double overtime from happening. 88-85 SFA.
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, ain't that something. Kudos to the boys, that's a great comeback, you can only play the team in front of you.
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Wow. Overtime after seeming like we were completely dead in the water. No Look's prayers being answered.
The evidence of things not seen.
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I watched the very end at the last minute and forgot we were playing and the time zone differences. WHAT A SHOT! I know we suck at shooting but letting Sylla shoot the three more 2/4 isn't that bad.
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whew. Whew. Whew.
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought Sylla played his best game tonight. Did not look that bad.
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigJack85 said:

No heart. No drive. No pride.
That aged well.

I said after the Lamar game that, in spite of real talent gaps this team has, the one thing that they now have is no shortage of heart and desire. That opinion is based on what I saw in the second half of that game, and what I saw on their faces after the Lamar game ended. They were put in an un-winnable position by the previous coach. They could have laid down, but haven't. Indeed, they may not win another game. But, if they don't, it wouldn't be from lack of effort. I'm proud of them.
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Post of the week 76
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFAJack_76 said:

BigJack85 said:

No heart. No drive. No pride.
That aged well.

I said after the Lamar game that, in spite of real talent gaps this team has, the one thing that they now have is no shortage of heart and desire. That opinion is based on what I saw in the second half of that game, and what I saw on their faces after the Lamar game ended. They were put in an un-winnable position by the previous coach. They could have laid down, but haven't. Indeed, they may not win another game. But, if they don't, it wouldn't be from lack of effort. I'm proud of them.


They certainly have moments. Just the overall movement seems 75%. Sometimes they look like the rebounding machine we were at the beginning of the season. Now, I don't see the effort. Do we have players that want to win? Sure. But battling it out to beat a team that has won 4 games this season is telling.

Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
RedRiverLa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I not against putting the 2/3 of the court shot in our regular offense at any point during the game.
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedRiverLa said:

I not against putting the 2/3 of the court shot in our regular offense at any point during the game.
. That shot percentage was 100% lot better than the three or free throws percentage. So why not? lol
SCH890
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly looking at the stats it seems like Jasick is playing more people into their strengths while Keller forced our players into roles they aren't comfortable in. We tried to make Sylla a big man when hes a lanky guy who can shoot beyond the arc as well just do a simple jumper. You play your roster to makes what makes them great not forced them into roles they will suffer in.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just putting this here: Lumberjacks are 10-13. Could we still have a winning season?
jboy93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Just putting this here: Lumberjacks are 10-13. Could we still have a winning season?
Going 6-2 in the final 8 will be a tall order to fill but hey, so your saying there's a chance!?
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.