We seems to play better in man than zone. Not sure why we keep switching it.
SFA / #12 Oregon
1,961 Views |
49 Replies |
Last: 12 days ago by SCH890
AJ = Underrated
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
Another terrible pass by Pangonis. Geezz...
Moral victory
Well, we did not get embarrassed. Played OK in the second half, held our own. Hayman was a bright spot. Stone played pretty well, too. Only 3-20 from three.
Had the same amount of fieldgoals, more shot attempts, outrebounded them, more points in the paint.
They obliterated us on the foul line.
They obliterated us on the foul line.
Pros: Second Half way better than first half.
In drive shooting fantastic.
Cons: Passing, Zone Defense, and Shooting (Could be way better)
In drive shooting fantastic.
Cons: Passing, Zone Defense, and Shooting (Could be way better)
Texas Wesleyan this Friday. The Jacks better get the W.
"History has no rubbish heap." Louis Blake Duff
What exactly am I looking at here?
SCH890 said:
What exactly am I looking at here?
Basically how the Vegas final score spread changes throughout the game. At the worst, SFA was predicted to lose by over 30 points. By the end of the game the spread had dwindled significantly.
It's pretty much showing that we drastically improved in the second half.
nacluth said:
Had the same amount of fieldgoals, more shot attempts, outrebounded them, more points in the paint.
They obliterated us on the foul line.
Looking at the stats makes this frustrating. If we were even a slightly better shooting team, we could've made it a close, winnable game at the end. Our Achilles heel is truly that we can't buy a basket. And turning the ball over 22 times didn't help our cause.
Down 14 at the half and lost by 18. They were four points better the second half. Several of their points were gimmies overall some positive things.
Nice. In person it did look like we did play better in the second half. Biggest thing I noticed Oregon let up the heavy press on some drives. So we actually could do something. I still wish we played to that level of defense like we used too. We give so much at the start.SFASawmillGuy said:SCH890 said:
What exactly am I looking at here?
Basically how the Vegas final score spread changes throughout the game. At the worst, SFA was predicted to lose by over 30 points. By the end of the game the spread had dwindled significantly.
It's pretty much showing that we drastically improved in the second half.
I never use the Foul line as a guide. We just couldn't make our FG when we needed them espicially the 3PT line. In any big game we won't get foul calls when there clearly is some fouls. Just look at the Duke game from 2019 (11-17 for us versus 24-40). I could go find more examples I know Baylor in 2020 is another.SFASawmillGuy said:nacluth said:
Had the same amount of fieldgoals, more shot attempts, outrebounded them, more points in the paint.
They obliterated us on the foul line.
Looking at the stats makes this frustrating. If we were even a slightly better shooting team, we could've made it a close, winnable game at the end. Our Achilles heel is truly that we can't buy a basket. And turning the ball over 22 times didn't help our cause.
Featured Stories
See All
SFA / New Mexico State
by The Sawmill
SFA / New Mexico State (2)
by The Sawmill
SFA / Abilene Christian
by The Sawmill
SFA / South Dakota State
by The Sawmill