SFA / Furman

5,955 Views | 75 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pilotgirl
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We took 10 more shots than Furman and scored 7 fewer buckets. Cold cold cold. Hawkins and Nana are hitting above their scoring averages.
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These broadcasters are so entertaining. Really doing a great job.
SFA88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You know you have problems when Nana is your second leading scorer.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Finally Jossell. 6 points straight for SFA for the first time.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
13-0 run. Too bad we started 24 back. Edit. 15-0 run to bring it to a 9 point game before the first media of the second half.
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AJ is great!
SFA88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very impressive comback!
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a game. Ain't no quit!
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a real game. Furman has a couple players but you can see why they haven't beaten a top 200 team yet.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tie game!
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Last 4 minutes have been ugly. Final media down by 2.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Two Jossell threes. Up by 2 with 2 minutes.
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jossell!!!!
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hawk!!!!!
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waved off.
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proud of these Jacks. I had written them off for dead at the half. Glad they had a better attitude than me.
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jossell 21points
AJ 18 points
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The waved off 3 was huge.
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm claiming moral victory.
purpleballs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks1989 said:

The waved off 3 was huge.

Hawkins fouling diving after loose ball 80 ft from their basket with 7 seconds on shot clock was huge.
TallTexan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not a fan of the one shot and change of possession tech.

We should have immediately called a fake timeout too.
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacks1989 said:

The waved off 3 was huge.


Yep. A game of inches and mini-seconds. If that three is counted the game is ours. But it was the correct ruling.
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't get to watch, unfortunately. From what I can can gather we made quite a comeback.
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigJack85 said:

Didn't get to watch, unfortunately. From what I can can gather we made quite a comeback.


Yeah, you might say that.
nacluth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well the game was a little bit of a heartbreaker in that the terrible start really defined the context of the game. The Jacks showed that they had more than enough ability to win and probably handily.

The comeback and heart was immensely impressive. Jossell can be a huge difference maker, but a scoreless half hurt. Ware must be worse off than we know. Hawkins continues to impress. AJ is a stud and has been playing as good as Posey has ever played. I can't wait to see them on the court together again.

I have no idea what happened on that technical at the end of the game. In the replay, the side ref clearly calls a foul that should lead to two shots, but they go with the technical after the play for one. That is mind-boggling. The guy still hits the shot, but it's different playing for OT or playing against a loss.

Definitely a lot heart and a lot of upside to this team. I hope we see it come WAC play. With the new seeding system, we can't lose more than about three games in conference play to have a realistic shot of a top seed. We could easily end up third in the WAC but fifth or sixth in the tournament due to our rating.

Let's get this thing rolling.
SFA88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
purpleballs said:

Jacks1989 said:

The waved off 3 was huge.

Hawkins fouling diving after loose ball 80 ft from their basket with 7 seconds on shot clock was huge.
They play so smart and tough and then you see something like that, it leaves you scratching your head.
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFA88 said:

purpleballs said:

Jacks1989 said:

The waved off 3 was huge.

Hawkins fouling diving after loose ball 80 ft from their basket with 7 seconds on shot clock was huge.
They play so smart and tough and then you see something like that, it leaves you scratching your head.
Got caught up in the moment. Learning curb
Pilotgirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was only able to watch the last 6 or so minutes....wow! I know we don't like to blame the refs fir an outcome but there were so many questionable calls from that ref crew!

Proud of the teams resiliency...get everyone back for conf play & we will be ready to take on the WAC!
BigJack85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nacluth said:

Well the game was a little bit of a heartbreaker in that the terrible start really defined the context of the game. The Jacks showed that they had more than enough ability to win and probably handily.

The comeback and heart was immensely impressive. Jossell can be a huge difference maker, but a scoreless half hurt. Ware must be worse off than we know. Hawkins continues to impress. AJ is a stud and has been playing as good as Posey has ever played. I can't wait to see them on the court together again.

I have no idea what happened on that technical at the end of the game. In the replay, the side ref clearly calls a foul that should lead to two shots, but they go with the technical after the play for one. That is mind-boggling. The guy still hits the shot, but it's different playing for OT or playing against a loss.

Definitely a lot heart and a lot of upside to this team. I hope we see it come WAC play. With the new seeding system, we can't lose more than about three games in conference play to have a realistic shot of a top seed. We could easily end up third in the WAC but fifth or sixth in the tournament due to our rating.

Let's get this thing rolling.


Ya. These guys are tough. No doubt.

The seeding system. I'm interested in how that thing turns out. Just from the eye test (watching 7-8 other WAC squads) I d say we are in the top 4. If we get a couple more pieces back we could be dangerous
Axe 'Em Jacks - Class of 85'
SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tezeno came in for a couple of minutes, went out, and never returned. He must not have been quite ready.
SFAJack_76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFA Jack Fanatic said:

Tezeno came in for a couple of minutes, went out, and never returned. He must not have been quite ready.

Box score says he played 14 minutes.
Jacks1989
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Day Day played 33 minutes. 7 rebounds 4 points

Do y'all like the bulked up Day Day or the lighter player from last year. I will go with the slimmed down. I realize he has injury issues. Just think he was quicker last year.
No-look
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watching Keller's presser after the game. He was not a happy camper
PurpleOut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
Tough to end it like that, especially after the effort and ability to get back in that game. We can't get down that big and expect to be able to win, that will always be on us. Huge credit to our guys for fighting back and never giving up. Really awesome to see.

However, just to add to a few other comments on yesterday's crew. To say they were inconsistent would be accurate. I've said plenty of times in my years that officiating doesn't lose games, but it makes an impact on how you play and DOES make a difference. Especially when the inconsistencies come in big moments

1. They were 100% wrong on the technical at the end. First off I don't think they knew what they were actually calling. There was a timeout called, but it was verbal and to me looked like there was a tie ball first...and thus should have been our ball. The closest ref was actually trying to call a foul and I guess was overruled when they discussed. BUT, the call they did make was incorrect in awarding us with one FT. According to the rule book we should have been rewarded with two FTs and not the one. I confirmed with a friend of mine that is an NCAA official.



That said, if Bothwell makes the shot they still win anyway. BUT, taking a shot that you have to make vs taking a shot knowing OT is the worst outcome is very different. You can't mess that up as an official.

2. We (Nigel I believe) got called for the technical for pulling on the rim. Marginal at best, but if you're going to call it why didn't Furman get called for the same thing earlier in the game? I'd let them both go, but that's not what they did.

3. There was a sequence where Slawson had a follow up on a miss that looked like the ball was still above the rim. It was never reviewed, but afterwards Slawson stood there for a good 2-3 seconds and just stared down Hall. That's a technical every time I've seen that situation.

Again, we can't put ourselves in the position we were in and expect to win. Keller said the same thing after the game. But it's extremely frustrating to watch close games go against you when the officiating crews make incorrect calls or just flat out don't know the rules of the game. We're talking about a possible 5 point difference with the above.

Moving on!

SFA Jack Fanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No-look said:

Watching Keller's presser after the game. He was not a happy camper


If you haven't warched the presser, you need to. Coach K is one frustrated coach. Everything that can gone wrong has gone wrong.

He even said that two walkon's are injured, too. And he said (joking or not, I'm not sure) that his 7th grade son practiced with them so they could have ten bodies on the court.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.