That would be a nightmare logistically. Every away game would be so expensive.

TheRevSFA said:

---

TallTexan said:

---

SFAJack_76 said:

---

I thought "parody"was an interesting way to look at it. Then I thought perhaps you meant "parity." Then I read it again and thought either could work.

---

Same. Parody or parity, either way FCS football is only important to FCS schools. Even then, I'd love to be a fly on the wall in Hill's office if SFA put together a comparable period of SFA's 2011-16 basketball results with Sam's 2011-2016 football results just to see which conferences call to kick the tires.

---

I actually heard a rumor from someone affiliated with a MVC school that the MVC contacted SFA for basketball.

Arch madness could have been fun

---

I'd have been more interested if they still had Wichita State. I'd aim for the Sunbelt personally. However, if you put together 5 great years in both programs like that, I wouldn't put Conference USA out of the realm of possibilities when the Big 12 expands and starts the dominos. However, if FBS is a moonshot, Conference USA is like landing a man on Mars.

I'd be good with MVC. It has the ability to be a multi-bid league, even without Wichita State.

If we are sticking close to home, I guess C-USA, but not really sold on them. Staying away from Sun Belt. I don't see a huge jump up in conference prestige there...

SFAJack_76 said:

---

I thought "parody"was an interesting way to look at it. Then I thought perhaps you meant "parity." Then I read it again and thought either could work.

---

Definitely mean parity... my bad.